Code review and audit
We read an existing codebase honestly — for quality, security, and whether it is truly ready for production — and hand back findings you can act on, ranked by what actually matters.
An audit is only useful if it is honest and specific. A list of generic warnings helps no one; what helps is knowing exactly where the real risks are, how bad each one is, and what to do about it — with the file and line to prove it.
We review the way we hold our own code: across correctness, security, performance, and production-readiness, against a real standard rather than taste, and we tell you plainly what we would fix first and what can wait.
What an audit covers
-
Severity-ranked findings
Every issue rated by real impact, so you spend effort on what could actually hurt you rather than on a flat list where a typo sits next to a data leak.
-
Evidence, not opinion
Each finding pinned to the file and line that shows it, with a clear explanation of why it matters — so your team can verify it, not just take our word.
-
Ready for production, honestly
A straight read on whether the thing is safe to ship — the gaps in tests, the missing error paths, the security holes — and what closing them takes.
Related from Ekarche
Inherited a codebase you are unsure of?
Point us at it and tell us what you are worried about. We will read it honestly and tell you what we find.